On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 17:58:12 Olivier Crête wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:45 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:21:40PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 14:46:06 William Hubbs wrote: > > > > The simplest fix for this would be for us to add /libexec to > > > > baselayout and start using it for platform-agnostic code. We have > > > > /usr/libexec, so I don't know why we don't have /libexec. Should we? > > > > > > same answer as last time people have asked about /libexec: no. we dont > > > need it, and it's ugly cruft that no other distro ive seen uses, and > > > this isnt something we need to differentiate Gentoo. > > > > The same thing should be applied to /usr/libexec then shouldn't it? > > (just asking for more info here) > > /usr/libexec is used by almost all major distros (except Debian), it has > been standardin Red Hat since before the FHS existed.
and i think Debian is sane for not following ;) -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
