On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 05:36:21 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 16.3.2011 07:48, justin napsal(a): > > On 15/03/11 22:25, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > >> i am seriously hurt by $(use_enable amd64 64) > > > > Where is the problem? The purpose of the eclass is not to repeat the > > same code 20 times. Why can't this be here? > > Problem is in amd64, what if we get to 64b mips OR ppc64 or any other > non-32bit arch?
or using the upcoming x32 ABI with KEYWORDS=amd64 ? if a package has a configure flag to control "64bitness", it is absolutely broken. figure out what exactly the "64bitness" means (pointer size ? data width ? assumptions about size of long ?) and replace it with a proper configure time check. then the whole 64 configure flag can be thrown away. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
