On 04/12/2010 02:20 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200 > Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org>: >>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it >>> just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a >>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about >>> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: >>> >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 >>> >>> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract >>> says: "We will not hide problems" >> >> Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER. > > "Me too."© > > What happens to bugs already in that state though? > >
I would imagine they could be kept in the db as it is but just remove the options from the UI. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
