On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200 Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org>: > > I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it > > just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a > > different resolution should be used. So what do you think about > > disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 > > > > Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract > > says: "We will not hide problems" > > Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER. "Me too."© What happens to bugs already in that state though? -- fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
