On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 08:52:10PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Hanno Böck wrote: > >> So what do you suggest? Remove "GPL-COMPATIBLE" and move everything > >> into "FSF-APPROVED"? > > > Yeah, I think that's reasonable. > > I've just learned that GLEP 23 explicitly requires GPL-COMPATIBLE to > be present. > > The GLEP would also require a NON-MUST-HAVE-READ group: > "NON-MUST-HAVE-READ licenses are those that don't require manual > acceptance for to be considered legally binding." Whatever that means. Some licenses (eg some in @EULA) require explicit acceptance of the license.
@NON-MUST-HAVE-READ was supposed to be all licenses that you agree to merely by using any material under them. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
