>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Hanno Böck wrote: >> So what do you suggest? Remove "GPL-COMPATIBLE" and move everything >> into "FSF-APPROVED"?
> Yeah, I think that's reasonable. I've just learned that GLEP 23 explicitly requires GPL-COMPATIBLE to be present. The GLEP would also require a NON-MUST-HAVE-READ group: "NON-MUST-HAVE-READ licenses are those that don't require manual acceptance for to be considered legally binding." Whatever that means. Ulrich
