-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > "Nirbheek Chauhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted > below, on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:37:10 +0530: > >> How about we just skip the reversed-boolean-usage/it's-a-long-name >> confusion/argument and just call it RESTRICT=tarballs ? >> >> I know not all distfiles are tarballs, but it gets the message across >> far better than "constant-sources" IMO :o) > > +1 > > The simplicity of "live" with the negative connotation of restrict, seems > to kill both those issues with a single stone. =8^) > > RESTRICT=tarballs works for me! >
I don't like RESTRICT=tarballs because I don't think it's clear enough. I think we should go with RESTRICT="live-sources". Maybe it doesn't fit your convention, I'm pretty sure we already have other RESTRICT flags that don't fit your convention. How about "primaryuri", for example? Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiVcw8ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOLFwCfU/tvAxDpYl/3urruB9B5ba+U 6qwAn1bJ47ZCY0ZjW/vjR9qEc4KyDc8C =GcXp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
