-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2008-08-02 04:02:48 Zac Medico napisał(a): > The names of other RESTRICT values are related to features which are > restricted. The new proposed value is intended for live ebuilds so its > name should be negation of this feature. I think that something like > RESTRICT=constant-sources would be better.
Like I've said before, that particular convention is pretty worthless in my eyes. I'd much prefer RESTRICT=live-sources if we want to use a longer name. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiU6I8ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOGLgCfcSDPfcoxmOdgZZlG4j1ag10O LxoAoKlrcrCVMYPaGQCTKF0Qf5GcljBP =9nNG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----