On Sunday 06 May 2007 3:31:32 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2007 15:26:06 -0400 > > Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 06 May 2007 2:47:22 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 May 2007 20:41:24 +0200 > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Ciaran, if you where a bit more verbose you could save time. > > > > > > If people read the rest of the thread and the GLEP we'd all save a > > > lot more, and if people also tried out a reference implementation > > > then none of these threads would need more than about three posts... > > > > You say this, but every time someone quotes a relevant refuting part > > of the GLEP, you ignore it. > > > > Try this one: > > Read the rest of the threads. I've already answered that several times.
No, I've read the other threads. You've not explained how this is a critical update that requires a news item. You've said repeatedly in response to related questions that your experience with news for one package in one overlay used by a small subset of users that uses said package recieved good feedback, and that they would like to be informed of changes in the future. You were informed that elog can do just that, and you said repeatedly that elog is not sufficient because its not loggged by default. You could easily make elog logged by default in paludis, and that would achieve the same result as a news item. What did I forget? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
