On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:00:56 -0400 Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Er, making elog logged by default would not solve the "requires an > > explicit read" problem. Making elog require an explicit read would > > be far too annoying because most elog notices are noise. We've been > > over this already. > > Not if one filters it properly. ELOG_CLASSES="warn error" sounds > like a sane default to me.
So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by overusing it. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
