On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:56:02 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Best I can figure, the offered reason is "it needs to be blocked > before it becomes widespread thus cannot be blocked any further"- > which isn't much of a reason since the support is long term there > already, and doesn't state *why* it needs to be blocked (just states > "it needs to be blocked"). It's better stated as "we need to put a hold on this so that a reasoned discussion can be had, and a decision made, before use becomes so widespread as to force the issue regardless of what is decided on technical merits." -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
