Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Stephen Bennett wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it >>>> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. >>>> >>>> >>> There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, >>> and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an >>> interim decision. >>> >>> >> Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and >> could not wait for a regular council meeting? >> >> Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis >> doesn't support that. >> But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. >> > > You mean real Gentoo users that use a Portage version that don't support > multiple suffixes, right ? > Portage doesn't support it in very old versions. The ebuilds in question are marked ~arch. Any one using ~arch with an old version of Portage would have been forced to upgrade by the point of installing those ebuilds. Also, Portage gracefully handles the situation by ignoring those ebuilds. > Oh... also... paludis supports it in trunk. Could you please stop the > conspiracy theories ? > > - ferdy > > Like I previously stated, I apologize for not running the very latest Paludis trunk. I only have actual releases available to me and those releases, including the newest one do not support it.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
