Bryan Østergaard wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Bryan Østergaard wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>> >>> >> Bryan, >> >> You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over and >> support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during a >> non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking. >> >> It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA >> issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years >> that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with >> paludis you guys are quick to respond. >> >> > Please stop the conspiracy theories. This has nothing to do with paludis > and everything to do with what we consider sane in the tree - no matter > which package manager you use. And as stated otherwise paludis already > supports multiple suffixes even if it's not in a released version yet so > it's not an issue for paludis either. > > Regards, > Bryan Østergaard > It's not a sane tree. There have been very specific uses cases that have been discussed on ML and in #-dev that have highlighted the possible need for this.
Like I said before, if you're concerned about tree QA.. There's bigger and worse things out there that have been in the wild for much longer. I expect the council to now start taking FAST action on those issues. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
