Bryan Østergaard wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Stephen Bennett wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it >>>> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. >>>> >>>> >>> There were three council members who happened to be around at the time, >>> and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for an >>> interim decision. >>> >>> >> Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and >> could not wait for a regular council meeting? >> >> Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since paludis >> doesn't support that. >> But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. >> >> I think we are setting a VERY dangerous precedent by allowing a subset >> of council members to make decisions as a whole if they decide to make a >> decision outside of a normal session. >> >> Who were the 3? >> > Already stated in another reply on this thread but the three council > members were robbat2, kugelfang and myself. > > Regards, > Bryan Østergaard > Bryan,
You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over and support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during a non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking. It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with paludis you guys are quick to respond. Very poor taste.... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
