Markus Ullmann wrote: > 6) problems on infra hardware > > Well Lance arised that, so if infra has that big concerns about this > project (I personally see no hard reason for it, but let the infra guys > handle it how they want), then feel free to drop me a note and we host > it elsewhere. I really see a great chance for contributors here as they > can improve themselves here and if they contribute good quality, even > commit themselves and learn how to handle maintainership. You all know > we also have some people out there that would like to maintain just one > or two packages. Now we call it proxy maintainership but why not giving > them commit access to sunrise then? They can maintain it here without > the whole workload as dev, but maybe they get encouraged by doing so and > then become a dev later. Lots of options are possible here.
Thanks for the clarification. To clarify my point, I'm all for helping our distro, but I just don't want this project to be labeled as a more official BMG. If you suit the needs of what the devs think is the right way to do this, then I'm all for it. I just noticed several mails from the project that seemed to be ignoring the issues at hand and I wasn't going to support the project on infra if they continued to be like that. Thanks for answering most of those questions. I'll let the developer community decide if they like them or not :-). -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
