Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > It's not a "normal" overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an
> > official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion.

Well partly you're right. As it is promoted that way it is a bit more
official but anyway still an overlay.

> > Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the
> > internet?

Well at least briefly. We decided to maintain it in an official way and
thus keep an eye on the quality of the checkins. As said, at least a
briefly view at it and also a repoman scan.

We're going to have some contributors at it so it wouldn't be an easy
job but I think we can get some more of them that way.
Searched my inbox and found a mail saying this:

--- Paste ---
"He was trying to recruit me as a Gentoo developer. Unfortunately, I
turned him down, the main reason being time. Also, I don't really
need/want the status/powers/responsibilities that come with being a
developer, so that was another reason.

He then suggested that I become an arch-tester, or maybe contribute to
this public overlay that you have in mind. The arch-tester position
didn't seem that appealing to me. The public overlay on the other hand
is more suitable for me. I like to write the occasional ebuild and there
are some ebuilds writen by me in Bugzilla that are currently assigned to
maintainer-wanted so getting these in an overlay would be nice. Also, I
would assume that the barrier of entry and time requirements are lower
than the developer position.
--- Paste ---

Sounds he likes to contribute / maintain some apps, just not the whole
thing you have to do when being a full dev. But he expressed his
interest in this as a possible entry point. So I guess we can keep an
eye on him...

But one thing is important: As the project has some overlay nature,
there _may_ be the one or other small issue with it. On the other hand
what ebuild is 100% bugfree?  ;)  QA would have nothing todo then... And
here we don't break the (stable) tree if some really nasty issue ever
slips through our fingers.

Greetz,
Jokey


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to