On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:08 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Abuse from people like you whenever someone finally gets brave enough > to document all the ways in which webapp-config is broken.
This isn't the first time we've heard this tune from you, and alas I fear it won't be the last. You know where bugzilla is. You know how to contact any of the webapp-config maintainers via email, or via IRC. We're ready to listen to your input, and to work with you (or anyone else) on fixing any genuine problems that webapp-config has. The more feedback we get, the better we can make this package for everyone's enjoyment. Please make sure you test your issues against webapp-config v1.5.10 or later, as that is the latest testing version of the package. But - if you're not going to take up any of those means of contacting us with your issues, and instead prefer to behave like this, making general statements about quality that you're not willing to substantiate and share with the package maintainers in question, then kindly step down from the QA team. There can be no place for someone who prefers to abuse the mantle of QA work to attack other people's reputations, exactly like you've just done, if the Gentoo QA team is to have credibility. Put up, or shut up, once and for all. Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://blog.stuartherbert.com/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
