On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:04:52 -0600 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > My point is that that's a nasty QA bug that's relying upon input | > from Stuart to be fixed. Whilst that one's still alive, I'm not | > going to go around filing more similar "breaks non-interactively" | > bugs because the discussion will just get repeated over and over. | | Huh? I just read through the bug, and it actually appears to be | resolved pending Chris' testing w/ the needed USE flags added to the | various profiles. I'll admit that the fix is inelegant, but I'm | missing where it's waiting upon Stuart for additional info. Am I | missing something?
Yup. It's a huge policy violation being passed off as a feature. See http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1 in the paragraph starting "Occasionally, ebuilds will have conflicting USE flags for functionality.". -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
