On Friday 18 November 2005 22:20, Michael Cummings wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > There are several requests on the bug, the majority are now fixed and > > > > everybody (at least within the portage team) is agreed that FEATURES > > should not be added to USE_EXPAND. Essentially, I didn't take the time > > to read through all the follow-ups related (and unrelated) to the one > > request that wasn't addressed. A comment didn't seem to be required as > > it appeared to be one of those bugs that are left open for months after > > being fixed. Reopen and adjust the summary to something relevant if > > you like. > > There's a reason that bugzilla mandates you provide a comment before > closing a bug - even if its to say what you just did.
"Resolved - Fixed"? > While the bug may have devolved, the original gist still stands - can we > have a means of having FEATURES="maktest" translated into a use flag > without requiring users to set both? (see my last comment in the bug for > my interest on the matter :) I'm not advocating a full FEATURE explosion > or anything of the like, and maybe this is something that should have > been a USE flag and not a FEATURE to begin with, but its where we're at. The last discussion that was had ended up with a TDEPEND, but that doesn't cover the additional SRC_URI requirements. Besides SRC_URI, are there any other requirements that might sneak in later on? > I can of course take this over to bugzilla if you'd prefer :) Nah, let's get it in the open (again) and get it dealt with. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
