On Saturday 19 November 2005 01:13, Michael Cummings wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > "Resolved - Fixed"? > > Hmmm, might have been aq epiphany quirk (wouldn't be the first) - when i > looked there was no comment indicated.
Nope. I wrote ".". Bugs wrote the above for me. ;) > > The last discussion that was had ended up with a TDEPEND, but that > > doesn't cover the additional SRC_URI requirements. Besides SRC_URI, are > > there any other requirements that might sneak in later on? > > and this is the other reason i took it off -dev - so i don't sound like > an idiot -there's a TPDEPEND now?? That would 100% cover my needs, since > these are testing depends. A TDEPEND? Nope, not yet. It's just a possible solution that won't require overloading USE flags for internal purposes further. > > Nah, let's get it in the open (again) and get it dealt with. > > OK, so i violated that, but now i'm wondering if my needs are already > covered (hey, could happen) :) Not just yet... -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
