Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:02:02 -0500 as excerpted: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Tamas Karpati <tkarp...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Thanks for your toughts. Following your suggestion I'm going to >> evaluate VB while experimenting a bit more with WS. >> I think I'll let them compete. > > If you're going to consider something new I'd certainly look at KVM as > well (libvirt/virt-manager/etc).
Since I can't/won't agree to EULAs I don't run proprietary, and would strongly prefer KVM here. However... Last I knew KVM didn't support MS-based VMs. Has that changed? Because while if anything that's a positive for me, it's going to put KVM out of the running for many, if it's still true. And if kvm supports MS VMs now, I'd like to know that, as it could come in handy in the next thread like this, even if I'll never be using it myself (unless someone else, say an employer, is taking responsibility for that EULA thing I won't personally agree to). =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
