Hey, man. There are some bugs that already been solved in bugs.gentoo.org. Take a look, get the patches and try again to compile.
IMHO, VirtualBox is too slow compared with vmware softwares. Ok, compile correctly every time, but doesn't worth it. Best Regards and Good Luck. On 02/04/2015 03:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Tamas Karpati <tkarp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for your toughts. Following your suggestion I'm going >> to evaluate VB while experimenting a bit more with WS. >> I think I'll let them compete. > If you're going to consider something new I'd certainly look at KVM as > well (libvirt/virt-manager/etc). > > I can't pretend to have done a full-feature comparison between the > various options, but the obvious advantage of KVM is that it is in the > vanilla kernel and fully open-source. Wrappers like virt-manager give > you a workstation-like presentation but all the guts are fully > command-line controllable and use standard kernel features. I don't > know if it supports snapshotting of running systems, however (ie > including RAM/hardware/etc state). > > I don't know what your exact needs are, but obviously being 100% FOSS > gives you a lot of options you won't have with any of the proprietary > stuff. If for some reason a kernel update breaks it you can complain > on lkml and watch it get fixed fast or at the very least get some > entertainment as Linus flames somebody to a crisp. > > -- > Rich >
