On Freitag 28 August 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: > On Fri, August 28, 2009 03:18, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Freitag 28 August 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: > >> On Fri, August 28, 2009 02:01, Frank Peters wrote: > >>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:34:24 +0200 > >>> > >>>> oh really? can mc present an audiocd as ogg/mp3/flac/wav files? > >>>> > >>>> I don't think so. > >>> > >>> I am not sure what is meant by "present an audio cd," but mc can be > >>> programmed by the user to accomplish a lot of tasks based on the file > >>> type. Therefore, although I have not researched this specific > >>> possibility, I would be inclined to believe that it can be done with > >>> mc. > >> > >> He is talking about a kio-slave that does kind of like the cdfs kernel > >> module, though in a more limited way. > >> > >> In kde, when you enter a cdaudio in your drive and open it, this > >> kio-slave presents you the cdaudio disk in an fs-like fashion, with a > >> number of folders. One folder containing ogg files, other mp3 files, > >> other wav files, and so on, depending on your USE flags and such things > >> > >> > >> This allows you to rip the thing by just dragging files into another > >> folder, though to tell the truth, it never worked reliably for me in > >> kde3, I have no idea if it has improved. > >> > >> mc already do this for a number of formats, like iso, via vfs's, I have > >> no idea how complex would it be to develop this for cdaudio, but, as > >> said we have cdfs anyway, and mc is not meant to be an audio encoder at > >> all. I'd vote against this, unless it can be implemented purely as an > >> vfs module or as an external addon without touching a single line of the > >> mc core. > > > > and cdfs also does the id3 tags? > > You really don't understand the nature of command line tools. Usually, > no tool will do everything. They concentrate on a task, and do it well. > I don't think cdfs does that, it does't need to. It's an fs driver... > > You can copy the file to wherever you want, and encode it and tag it > however you want. Including that into cdfs would be a nonsense, it would > replicate the functionality that's already there.
so why are you even bringing cdfs up?
