On Freitag 28 August 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: > On Thu, August 27, 2009 21:14, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Donnerstag 27 August 2009, Frank Peters wrote: > > Also: network transparency. > > mc can do whatever konqueror can, including ftp, ssh, samba, and some > more things that konqueror can't, isos, archives, etc. Oh, and it > actually work, unlike the io-slaves, which works sometimes (or so they > used to, to be frank, I haven't tested intensively these features in > kde4, only superficially).
oh really? can mc present an audiocd as ogg/mp3/flac/wav files? I don't think so. Konqueror can do archives just fine. or encrypt/decrypt files nicely. > > Well, I need konqueror and konsole and their working together. I need > > okular. I love gwenview. And I love the fact that I do not have to learn > > a whole new set of key-combos and config syntax for every single app I > > use. > > It's not a war, they all can coexist. I use fvwm and love mc and bash, > however I also think that okular is probably the best pdf viewer that > there has been in linux, ever. > > But this is really completely out of the purpose of the thread. well, I am just saying that even if Frank things highly integrated, code and functionanilty sharing DEs might be superfluos I am thinking the exact opposite.
