I would tend to agree with Jim. The commit rights never attached to "Jakarta" but only to a specific subproject under the Jakarta umbrella. There has never been any such thing as a Jakarta committer, only committers to current and former Jakarta subprojects. Likewise, there is no such thing as an ASF committer. The codebase commit rights attach to specific TLPs.
As mentioned elsewhere, the first graph might be even more interesting if the threshold was lowered, even to just one committer in common. -Ted. On Nov 18, 2007 4:10 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta... > > > > Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase* > cross-polination (as I understand it)... So yes, since most > committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since > those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think > that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation > of the "real" dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of > Jakarta. > > Of course, I could be wrong :) > -- > =========================================================================== > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > "Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war" ~ John Adams --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
