On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta
excluded.
Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example,
the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and
for Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
projects, has no connection to anything else...
Ant as a piece of software is pervasive - but are the Ant committers
pervasive?
I'd guess certainly more than an island.
Jukka's cloud shows community/commiter relationships rather
than software. The Jakarta one is interesting as it shows so much of
JavaLand at the ASF sprang from Jakarta. I agree with Jukka though -
it distorts the landscape.
But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
geir
Niall
geir
If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at
[2]. :-)
[1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
