The license under which the code gets licensed to our end users is in
LICENSE.txt.
Copyright notices and optional third-party licenses under which the code
got licensed to us is in NOTICE.
Thomas did the right thing.
Best regards
Henning
sebb schrieb:
> On 27/05/07, Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > I don't think so. The NOTICE is not supposed to contain the license.
>>
>> It doesn't. It contains what I understand as "license header" of that
>> one Xerox file and the associated copyright notice.
>>
>
> Sorry to keep going on about this, but I think it is important.
>
> At the moment the Xerox license header makes it look as though the
> software is being released under a Xerox license.
>
> That is confusing.
>
> If you don't want to add the Xerox header to LICENSE.txt, it can be
> put in a separate file which is referenced from NOTICE.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine
"Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
