Looks like we have a bunch of +1 votes for the source distribution based release.
We plan to do a minor release with a few changes, can we incorporate Justin's feedback then or we need to fix them now and reinitiate this voting thread? Best, Kranti > On Dec 1, 2025, at 10:45 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > There is another aspect to dependencies: > > products can depend on category-X licensed code, provided that the > dependency is optional: > > https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > > Of course, neither the source nor binary releases can contain cat-X > code; it is up to the user to provide it. > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 at 16:17, Piotr Gankiewicz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Reverting my vote to -1 (binding) for the binary distribution for the >>> reasons mentioned earlier in the thread (source distribution is OK). >> >> Could you please elaborate on the binary distribution part (I wrote it a few >> comments back), as we only publish the source distribution? All the >> mentioned issues with some jar binary in the repository or missing headers >> etc. were resolved already, but before I will create an rc2 artifact, I just >> wanted to make sure that it's all ok. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
