+1 on what Justin said. I was in the process of sending a similar response. The four items are more like best/common practices rather than actual policy violations.
Best, Stamatis On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 12:58 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for looking into this release in detail; I haven't, but off the top of > my head. > > > 1. Missing RC designation in release URL > > This is not a requirement, and projects can name releases when they want. > While using RC X is common, it’s not required. That naming does make it easy > if another candidate for the release is needed. > > > 2. Multiple repositories bundled in single vote (requires separate votes) > > This is fine, and many projects do this. > > > 3. Built artifacts missing "incubating" suffix (98.3% non-compliant) > > Official releases on Infra-supported platforms need to be named this way, so > yes, I think there seems to be an issue here, but perhaps this has not been > common practice and has been missed. What may be more important is do the > jars include an incubator disclaimer? > > > 4. Premature release tagging before vote completion > > GitHub tags are irrelevant as they are mutable; it's the hash that matters. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
