Ross said everything that I would have said... only better.

> On Aug 18, 2019, at 5:35 PM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Only replying because I'm called out explicitly.
> 
> Documentation does not solve the problem. If someone doesn't already "get" 
> this stuff then they should not be mentoring. Having a document does not 
> replace for selecting good mentors who have the time to do the job right.
> 
> It's a good effort in the broader context, but doesn't solve the problem I 
> see in the IPMC (insufficient high quality mentoring coupled with too much 
> application of rules in the process). The proposed doc is interesting but 
> it's just more words, We need more action.
> 
> How would I solve the problem? If I were championing another project into the 
> ASF I would carefully select mentors, just as I have in the past. I'd select 
> those who don't need the above document and who I'm confident will pay 
> attention and be constructive. I'd then work with those mentors and the 
> community to ensure people coming through the process are equipped to help me 
> on the next project I champion.
> 
> This is not new. It's how we setup the Incubator in the first place. But over 
> the years it has become a machine rather than personal relationships. More 
> words about the design of the machine won't change this.
> 
> I don't mean to say the effort you are putting in is wasted effort. Clarity 
> in what is expected can help the podlings, but I don't see how this can 
> really help those people I would already trust to be good mentors i.e. People 
> who have a vested interest in the success of the project and already know how 
> to apply the Apache Way to new communities so that they might flourish in 
> their own way.
> 
> Ross
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> Sent from my phone, you know what that means - sorry
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 6:26:32 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [MENTORS] Mentor guidance document
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've had hoped I'd get more of a response to the mentor guidance 
> documentation I suggested. Perhaps it got lost in the other noise?
> 
> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FINCUBATOR%2FMentor%2BGuidance&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e716c1bb8a74438cd0108d7237b24aa%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637016884106582384&amp;sdata=9v85p9zRNDFHPp3yJgpVp7GUz%2F0NDNvC8vQuZjT4X50%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Jim and Ross, you have recently stated that you are concerned about the 
> erosion of our values and principles. It would be great to see your input on 
> this. If you have other idea one how these values can be better passed to 
> incubating incubation it would be great to hear.
> 
> I also welcome other IPMC members who have experience and can offer some 
> advice to other mentors.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to