> On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:14 PM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...This vote is *confirming* that >> nobody has objections (of any form) to Zipkin leaving and control of the >> git repos being transferred... > > I agree and this means that in this case a [LAZY] vote would have been > sufficient.
pages/guides/retirement.ad | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pages/guides/retirement.ad b/pages/guides/retirement.ad index 98d8acb..12427d4 100644 --- a/pages/guides/retirement.ad +++ b/pages/guides/retirement.ad @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ ensures that all podling stakeholders are properly informed and have the opportunity to participate in the decision. The final decision to retire the podling takes the form of a -vote by the IPMC on general@incubator. +vote by the IPMC on general@incubator. The vote should be by LAZY consensus. == Steps to retirement @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ Once the IPMC vote to retire the podling has closed, a Mentor or other volunteer status page been checked off? If not, try to resolve it. If it cannot be resolved, the podling's source code must be removed from version control. +- It may be that the podling is moving or returning development elsewhere. If so, then modify the resolution attributes appropriately. - Delete the podling's dist dir, so that its releases will no longer be mirrored: #svn remove https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/${podling}# <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/$%7Bpodling%7D#>
