Hi,

> The biggest fix I’d suggest for the incubator is parallel voting 

Worthy of consideration (please start a thread), but IMO we want to be careful 
it doesn’t overwhelm the IPMC. I’ve seen some RCs got through 10+ votes, and 
most go through 2 or 3. That’s potentially 2 or 3 or 5x more calls for votes on 
the IPMC list, unless we modify it somehow or somehow get more IPMC members to 
vote on releases it’s going to need some careful consideration.

Some discussion on legal discuss and in the last board report may help reduce 
the requirement for revotes like that.

> after an IPMC vote failed yet again on some aspect that the
> community is not interested in at all (but should be, but still isn’t).

Or alternatively how could a podling get the community (or it's mentors) to 
pick up these things before the IPMC vote? In theory your mentors should pick 
up any issues that the IPMC finds, in practise that doesn't always happen.

Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to