+1 for taking consideration of release vote. It's quite important process of the podling.
Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think the problem is serious. I also think that signoff rate is a > better > > metric in practice than it seems it would be. > > That problem is indeed pretty serious and also pretty chronic. > > As for the metric -- I really think that using mentor turnout on release > voting threads will serve us well. > > > Adding the additional metric seems like a small step that could help. > > > > Being aggressive about removing non-mentors is a very good idea. It is > best > > if mentors remove themselves, but it is imperative that the incubator > has a > > realistic idea about how many mentors there really are. > > Big +1 on the above. Perhaps if we: > 1. get a clear indication on release vote turnout (as part of > Incubator report) > 2. add to it the sign-off turnout > > We can start at least nagging unresponsive mentors to begin > with and if behaviour doesn't improve -- suggest that podlings > start looking for a replacement. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
