On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? >> >> > Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we > can't remove the copyright claim that already exists. Us receiving an ICLA > is what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA). > > It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful > we're removing someone's pre-existing claim. > I'll give a more concrete example. Let's say I imported this file into an ASF repo https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/StringUtils.java I wouldn't change the header to say licensed to the ASF. None of the contributors have signed ICLAs. The file header would remain in tact. I would also have to carry their notice file around https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/src/docs/dist/notice.txt (at least I'm assuming this is their NOTICE file, I can't find any others around) John > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: >> > >> > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have >> explicit >> > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to >> the >> > NOTICE file. >> > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all >> > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some >> kind of >> > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has >> > been handled in the past). >> > >> > Please create JIRAs to track these. >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that >> all >> > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing >> project. >> > > >> > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for >> the >> > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible >> > wording >> > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most >> > are >> > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause >> 5 >> > of >> > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here. >> > > >> > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said >> > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors". >> > > >> > > Hen >> > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Henri, >> > > > >> > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who >> contributed >> > > to >> > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as >> > part >> > > of >> > > > IP Clearance. >> > > > >> > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. >> > > > >> > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the >> > incubator >> > > > who are not now committers? >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Craig >> > > > >> > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling >> > release. >> > > > Will >> > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. >> > > > > >> > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). >> Code >> > > has >> > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament < >> johndam...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Dominic, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time. Was MXNet always >> Apache >> > > > Licensed >> > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)? >> > > > >> >> > > > >> John >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni < >> > > > >> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so >> far. >> > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review >> and >> > > vote? >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this >> > > project? >> > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Dom >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament < >> > > johndam...@apache.org> >> > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding. Usually mentors review >> > > > releases. >> > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it? Due to >> there >> > > being >> > > > >> no >> > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review. I also need to cross check >> > > ICLAs >> > > > >> and >> > > > >>>> files that have changed license. >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" < >> > > > >>>> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> >> > > > >>>> wrote: >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can >> the >> > > > >>>> committers >> > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh >> in >> > on >> > > > >> this >> > > > >>>>> release? >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal < >> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> Hi All, >> > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet >> (incubating) >> > > > >> 0.11.0 >> > > > >>>> is >> > > > >>>>>> still open. >> > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC. >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 >> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> Thanks, >> > > > >>>>>> Meghna >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal < >> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) >> > 0.11.0, >> > > > >>>>> release >> > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3. >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread: >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>> >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea >> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea >> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread: >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>> >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 >> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 >> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can >> be >> > > > >>> found >> > > > >>>>> at: >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >> > > > >>> < >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here: >> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 < >> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd >> > and >> > > > >>> can >> > > > >>>>> be >> > > > >>>>>> found here: >> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ >> > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd < >> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/ >> > > > >>>>>> >> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549 >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here: >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >> > > > >>> < >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see: >> > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. >> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate < >> > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. >> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 >> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks. >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> -- >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni >> > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> >> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell >> > > > >>>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> -- >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni >> > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> >> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell >> > > > >>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Craig L Russell >> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >> > > > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
