On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote:
> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? > > Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we can't remove the copyright claim that already exists. Us receiving an ICLA is what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA). It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful we're removing someone's pre-existing claim. > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: > > > > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit > > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the > > NOTICE file. > > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all > > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind > of > > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has > > been handled in the past). > > > > Please create JIRAs to track these. > > > > John > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that > all > > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing > project. > > > > > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for > the > > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible > > wording > > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most > > are > > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 > > of > > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here. > > > > > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said > > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors". > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Henri, > > > > > > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who > contributed > > > to > > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as > > part > > > of > > > > IP Clearance. > > > > > > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. > > > > > > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the > > incubator > > > > who are not now committers? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling > > release. > > > > Will > > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. > > > > > > > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). > Code > > > has > > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Dominic, > > > > >> > > > > >> One question, from looking a second time. Was MXNet always Apache > > > > Licensed > > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)? > > > > >> > > > > >> John > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni < > > > > >> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so > far. > > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and > > > vote? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this > > > project? > > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Dom > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament < > > > johndam...@apache.org> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding. Usually mentors review > > > > releases. > > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it? Due to there > > > being > > > > >> no > > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review. I also need to cross check > > > ICLAs > > > > >> and > > > > >>>> files that have changed license. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" < > > > > >>>> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the > > > > >>>> committers > > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in > > on > > > > >> this > > > > >>>>> release? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal < > > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Hi All, > > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) > > > > >> 0.11.0 > > > > >>>> is > > > > >>>>>> still open. > > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 > > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>> Meghna > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal < > > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi all > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) > > 0.11.0, > > > > >>>>> release > > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea > > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea > > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Result thread: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 > > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 > > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can > be > > > > >>> found > > > > >>>>> at: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > > >>> < > > > > >>>>>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here: > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 < > > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd > > and > > > > >>> can > > > > >>>>> be > > > > >>>>>> found here: > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ > > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd < > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/ > > > > >>>>>> > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > > >>> < > > > > >>>>>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see: > > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate < > > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 > > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni > > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> > <(206)%20475-9200> Cell > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni > > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> > <(206)%20475-9200> Cell > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Craig L Russell > > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > > > > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
