I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see answered to be able to move forward on this.
- Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL. Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator, I expect that the "OpenWhisk" organization be handed over to us, and all non-IPMC members are removed. Once we receive ICLAs members are granted access back. Or the equivalent - we create a new "ApacheOpenWhisk" organization. - All committers who are in the "incubator" group are granted write access to OpenWhisk - the ASF still needs to maintain records of the revision history. I would like to understand the plan to provide this history. I'm not very comfortable with a policy that allows podlings to do things they can't do as TLPs. This is setting up for major delays in graduation. John On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:23 PM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has > requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra > Admin > has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it. > > I ask now: > > 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk? > 2. Is the IPMC OK with this in general availability for Podlings? > > I am +1 on both (IPMC hat on). > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
