On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle. > Has that been resolved?
LDAP is tens of hours worth of work - total. And I volunteered to do the bulk of the initial effort. Frankly, it is more of a timing consideration than either a cost or risk consideration. There will be unanticipated breakage (probably mostly in tools like the phone book, various whimsy tools, and ponymail) but those should be identified and fixable quickly. The right time seems to be shortly after people return from ACEU, so probably early December. - Sam Ruby > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has >> requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra >> Admin >> has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it. >> >> I ask now: >> >> 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk? >> 2. Is the IPMC OK with this in general availability for Podlings? >> >> I am +1 on both (IPMC hat on). >> >> Thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
