Lewis, please be patient. Edward and I are working on getting ICLAs signed, etc., and that process shouldn't block entry into the incubator.
>From an IP perspective, the age of the original codebase has no relevance. I will call a vote soon, but not until I'm confident that the IPMC has had adequate time to comment, and that those comments have been addressed. -Taylor On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ed, > If you were able to track down the GoogleCode authors and update this > thread then that would be good. > > @John, > bq. > I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be > > expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. > > From whom? The old GoogleCode community who have not touched this codebase > in over a year? If that is the case then this might get very tricky indeed! > > Regardless, this does not block a VOTE on proposing Gossip for the > Incubator. It is something which may resolve itself at a later date. I > would suggest that this bridge can be crossed when the Gossip incubating > community comes to it. > > I'll look forward to the Champion opening a VOTE thread. > Thanks > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:46 PM, <general-digest-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > wrote: > > > From: Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > > Cc: > > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:25:43 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:55 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be > > > expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. > > > > That's the usual protocol. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > > >
