I think the chances of anyone making so much as a squeak in those projects is close to zero.
Being that’s the case, my takeaway is that it’s ok to take them. Harbs On Nov 27, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> On 11/26/15, 4:47 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> There are two issues, one is the SGA and the other is the contributor >>> license agreements (ICLA) that are desirable to make sure that all of the >>> contributors understood that they were contributing under ASL. >> >> OK, so I think you are saying that we can't take over change control of >> these projects without paperwork from every contributor? That's what I >> was thinking as well, and why these donations may never get completed >> because several of the past contributors have moved on to other things and >> aren't following those projects anymore. > > > I don't think that this is hard and fast, but unless I was pretty sure that > nobody would rise from the dead and bitch and moan, I would be a bit > cautious. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
