On 11/26/15, 4:47 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>There are two issues, one is the SGA and the other is the contributor >license agreements (ICLA) that are desirable to make sure that all of the >contributors understood that they were contributing under ASL. OK, so I think you are saying that we can't take over change control of these projects without paperwork from every contributor? That's what I was thinking as well, and why these donations may never get completed because several of the past contributors have moved on to other things and aren't following those projects anymore. > >On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Is the other community alive? Is there consensus for moving to Apache >> within that other community? Those seems like the right questions. Have >>you >> started a discussion of moving to Apache on the public list of the other >> project? What was the response? >> >> Is an SGA needed? If not, is there a recommended practice for providing >> > notification such that folks who want to opt-out can find out the >> > change-control for code base is moving to the ASF? >> >> >> In my opinion, if the other community is dead or wants to move to >>Apache, >> the committers ICLA should be sufficient, given that the license is >>ALv2. These communities are effectively dead. I know one contributor from each project and they are the ones interested in donating. No commits in 4 years. But I think that since not all past contributors have Apache ICLAs we can't take over change control. -Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
