As pointed out it's about Cray, And it comes down to a specific document that would state that works of employee x except projects a,b,c are excluded. from their IP overlay
NRJ On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/5/2014 8:08 AM, Rob Vesse wrote: > > entirely by myself though obviously Cray holds the copyright. >> > > That little datapoint is not obvious at all. > > Whether or not that is the case depends upon the specific wording of your > contract with Cray, your legal jurisdiction, Cray's legal jurisdiction, > which statutes reflecting copyright and employment issues take precedence, > and how case law, if applicable, affects those statutes, contracts, etc. > > > In this scenario is a SGA actually needed to carry out IP Clearance of >> the contributed code or are the existing ICLA and CCLA sufficient? >> > > I'd suggest what is arguably the most conservative position possible. > > Show a clear chain of evidence showing who the legal copyright owner of > the contributed code is. > File an SGA for the IP Clearance of the contributed code. > Treat both the ICLA and CCLA as after-the-fact supplemental permissions. > > I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. > > jonathon > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Help Earth Foundation 4324 Yuma St. NW Washington, DC 20016 www.helpearthfoundation.org myspace.com/helpearthfoundation twitter.com/helpearthdotorg *(202) 643-5791 <https://www.google.com/voice#phones>* nel...@helpearth.org helpearthfoundat...@gmail.com
