On 4/5/2014 8:08 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
entirely by myself though obviously Cray holds the copyright.
That little datapoint is not obvious at all.
Whether or not that is the case depends upon the specific wording of
your contract with Cray, your legal jurisdiction, Cray's legal
jurisdiction,
which statutes reflecting copyright and employment issues take
precedence, and how case law, if applicable, affects those statutes,
contracts, etc.
In this scenario is a SGA actually needed to carry out IP Clearance of the
contributed code or are the existing ICLA and CCLA sufficient?
I'd suggest what is arguably the most conservative position possible.
Show a clear chain of evidence showing who the legal copyright owner of
the contributed code is.
File an SGA for the IP Clearance of the contributed code.
Treat both the ICLA and CCLA as after-the-fact supplemental permissions.
I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice.
jonathon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
