+1 Dan, people really do learn from the codebase as they whittle
on it.  I know when I first got commit at the ASF I knew precious
little about C, but after a few years of work here finally got the hang
of it.



----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>; Jukka Zitting 
> <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers
> 
> On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote:
>>  With my mentor hat on, this is a poke to remind you (the PPMC) that 
> it's
>>  your job to be on the lookout for contributors that may be ready to
>>  become committers.
>> 
>>  I look for several things when I consider making someone a committer:
>> 
>>  1) Patches, are they contributing quality features and/or bug fixes. They
>>  don't have to have written a new subsystem, but you want to look for
>>  patches that demonstrate understanding in some area, not just spelling
>>  fixes in error messages, etc.  
> 
> I just want to mention that patches that fix "just spelling fixes in error 
> messages, etc."  shouldn't be discounted so harshly.   In CXF, one of 
> the 
> historically most active contributors got started by deluging us with such 
> patches.   We made him a committer (so he could fix all of that himself) 
> which helped build his confidence and he's expanded out from there.   His 
> work just on the spelling mistakes and messages and stuff has been a big 
> help in making things "feel" more professional, especially in a 
> projects 
> where a large number of people don't have english as their native language.  
> 
> 
> All contributions are welcome and have value.   Just because it may not be 
> technical in nature doesn't make them have any less value from a 
> "should 
> this person be a committer" standpoint.  
> 
> But the rest of this is good.  :-)
> 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>  One good way to find what patches a
>>  contributor has done is to look over the contributor report from JIRA. 
>>  You can get this by going to your project's JIRA, and under the reports
>>  drop down on the right side, click on "Contribution Report".
>> 
>>  2) Emails, comments on JIRA, etc. giving others feedback, answering user
>>  questions, etc.  Again you can use the contribution report to see JIRA
>>  comments.  You can find emails in the mailing list archives for your
>>  project.
>> 
>>  3) Is this person good to work with?  Do they give constructive feedback? 
>>  Do they take feedback well?
>> 
>>  4) Does this person seem likely to stay involved?  All Apache positions
>>  are volunteer and so we can't ask people to sign up for a period of 
> time
>>  or promise to be around forever.  But if I sense that a contributor is
>>  just fixing one problem they need fixed, I usually wait to see if they
>>  continue their involvement after that issue is addressed before
>>  nominating them as a committer.
>> 
>>  Alan.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> -- 
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to