+1 (non-binding from a user/contributor) - pulled down the artifacts and did the maven tests on them. Got it to complete, but on one of the test runs I got test failures for TestPauseTransitService and TestSshActionExecutor. I think those may need to just be looked at for completion consistency and not anything to do with the code their testing.
On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > +1 > > looks good. > > Thanks, > Mayank > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> So can the other contributors/committers VOTE now? >> >> Yes >> >>> As oozie-user VOTE is already closed, what would be the best option at >> this stage? >>> 1. Go to genenral@incubator and vote there. >>> 2. Vote in the same threadat oozie-user >> >> Might as well show support/express reservations on the >> general@incubator thread so it's in one place. IIRC the general@ >> thread cc'd oozie-dev. -C >> >>> Regards, >>> Mohammad >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> >>> To: oozie-...@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com>; " >> oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org" <oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:13 PM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.1.3 (candidate 2) >>> >>> That's a pretty dire error in the documentation if that's the >>> impression. Projects (and podlings) are responsible for their code, >>> community, and releases. The PPMC certifies that the artifact >>> represents an iteration of its progress by voting on a release in some >>> series, just as a PMC does. >>> >>> The IPMC has a functionary, mundane role. It's supposed to make >>> cursory checks: code being released respects the licensing >>> requirements of dependencies, notices give accurate guidance to >>> downstream consumers of that code, etc. Since the ASF is releasing >>> that code under license, the idea is that IPMC members protect the >>> foundation from common misunderstandings (e.g. if a podling thought >>> they could release GPL'd code, someone else's code, etc.). >>> >>> Once the project has some experience with releases, a clear >>> understanding of what the ASF wants w.r.t. community, etc. then >>> podling graduates. Before that, the voting guidelines are necessary >>> because the IPMC members are acting on behalf of the foundation. The >>> vote from the PPMC expresses that the artifact represents their >>> output. The vote from the IPMC certifies that the artifact won't get >>> the ASF into legal trouble. >>> >>> Release votes are a strict majority per ASF bylaws. AFAICT, asserting >>> that the IPMC votes are the only ones that are binding in the second >>> round is just adding a layer of indirection to solve a counting >>> problem. -C >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >>>> Chris, >>>> >>>> I'm a bit confused here, I've thought that the significant votes where >> from >>>> the IPMC. >>>> >>>> I guess most of the committers/contributors thought along the same >> lines. >>>> >>>> Thxs. >>>> >>>> Alejandro >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The vote didn't attract any votes from contributors. As far as I know, >>>>> none of the voters in this thread actually develop Oozie. >>>>> >>>>> The IPMC vote is a check on the podling's compliance with licensing >>>>> and other foundation-level practices. It's far, far less significant >>>>> than the community's appraisal of the release itself. Would the PPMC >>>>> please weigh in? -C >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> As 72 hours has passed, I would like to close the vote. >>>>>> The proposed RC-2 got three +1s from three mentors without -1 or 0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Special thanks to mentors who gave their valuable feedback to make it >>>>> better. >>>>>> I also want to mention Alejandro and Virag who helped to make the >> whole >>>>> process smoother. >>>>>> Now I will ask for vote in general@incubator >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Moahmmad >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> From: Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com> >>>>>> To: oozie-...@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> Cc: Oozie-users <oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:42 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.1.3 (candidate 2) >>>>>> >>>>>> I ran the tests and also inspected the top level txt files. Looks >> good. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks everyone for giving valuable comments for the RC0 and RC1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I created a new candidate (RC2) build for Oozie-3.1.3 incorporating >>>>> most of the comments (including Chris's finding). >>>>>>> The following JIRAs were resolved based on the comments: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OOZIE-694 Update the Install and Quick start guide with appropriate >>>>> hadoop versions for branch-3.1 (Mohammad) >>>>>>> OOZIE-602 Update the Hadoop version to be an Apache Hadoop version >>>>> (tucu) >>>>>>> OOZIE-689 XTestCase proxyuser settings fails with Hadoop >> 1.0.0/0.23.1 >>>>> (tucu) >>>>>>> OOZIE-601 Oozie's POMs should use org.apache.oozie as group (tucu) >>>>>>> OOZIE-685 Update License file with 3rd party license information. >>>>> (Mohammad) >>>>>>> OOZIE-682 Update version 3.1.3 to 3.1.3-incubating in all >>>>> pom.xml.(Mohammad) >>>>>>> OOZIE-683 Add DISCLAIMER file in the root.(Mohammad) >>>>>>> OOZIE-681 Update readme.txt contents.(Mohammad) >>>>>>> OOZIE-680 oozie's assembly creates an extra level of empty >> subdirectory >>>>> for docs. (rvs via tucu) >>>>>>> OOZIE-608 testCoordChangeEndTime and testCoordChangeXCommand are >>>>> failing(Mohamed). >>>>>>> OOZIE-678 Update NOTICE.txt to reflect the workcount binaries into >>>>> oozie src(Mohammad) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/oozie/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please download, test, and try it out from here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~kamrul/oozie-3.1.3-incubating-candidate-2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release log, md5 signature, gpg signature, and rat report all >> can >>>>> be found at the above link. >>>>>>> In case, anyone is interested, the svn tag from the release was >> created >>>>> could be found at : >>>>>>> >>>>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oozie/tags/release-3.1.3-rc2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Feb 15th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Mohammad >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
