+1 looks good.
Thanks, Mayank On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > So can the other contributors/committers VOTE now? > > Yes > > > As oozie-user VOTE is already closed, what would be the best option at > this stage? > > 1. Go to genenral@incubator and vote there. > > 2. Vote in the same threadat oozie-user > > Might as well show support/express reservations on the > general@incubator thread so it's in one place. IIRC the general@ > thread cc'd oozie-dev. -C > > > Regards, > > Mohammad > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> > > To: oozie-...@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com>; " > oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org" <oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org> > > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.1.3 (candidate 2) > > > > That's a pretty dire error in the documentation if that's the > > impression. Projects (and podlings) are responsible for their code, > > community, and releases. The PPMC certifies that the artifact > > represents an iteration of its progress by voting on a release in some > > series, just as a PMC does. > > > > The IPMC has a functionary, mundane role. It's supposed to make > > cursory checks: code being released respects the licensing > > requirements of dependencies, notices give accurate guidance to > > downstream consumers of that code, etc. Since the ASF is releasing > > that code under license, the idea is that IPMC members protect the > > foundation from common misunderstandings (e.g. if a podling thought > > they could release GPL'd code, someone else's code, etc.). > > > > Once the project has some experience with releases, a clear > > understanding of what the ASF wants w.r.t. community, etc. then > > podling graduates. Before that, the voting guidelines are necessary > > because the IPMC members are acting on behalf of the foundation. The > > vote from the PPMC expresses that the artifact represents their > > output. The vote from the IPMC certifies that the artifact won't get > > the ASF into legal trouble. > > > > Release votes are a strict majority per ASF bylaws. AFAICT, asserting > > that the IPMC votes are the only ones that are binding in the second > > round is just adding a layer of indirection to solve a counting > > problem. -C > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> Chris, > >> > >> I'm a bit confused here, I've thought that the significant votes where > from > >> the IPMC. > >> > >> I guess most of the committers/contributors thought along the same > lines. > >> > >> Thxs. > >> > >> Alejandro > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> The vote didn't attract any votes from contributors. As far as I know, > >>> none of the voters in this thread actually develop Oozie. > >>> > >>> The IPMC vote is a check on the podling's compliance with licensing > >>> and other foundation-level practices. It's far, far less significant > >>> than the community's appraisal of the release itself. Would the PPMC > >>> please weigh in? -C > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Mohammad Islam <misla...@yahoo.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi All, > >>> > As 72 hours has passed, I would like to close the vote. > >>> > The proposed RC-2 got three +1s from three mentors without -1 or 0. > >>> > > >>> > Special thanks to mentors who gave their valuable feedback to make it > >>> better. > >>> > I also want to mention Alejandro and Virag who helped to make the > whole > >>> process smoother. > >>> > Now I will ask for vote in general@incubator > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Moahmmad > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ________________________________ > >>> > From: Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com> > >>> > To: oozie-...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > Cc: Oozie-users <oozie-us...@incubator.apache.org> > >>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:42 PM > >>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.1.3 (candidate 2) > >>> > > >>> > I ran the tests and also inspected the top level txt files. Looks > good. > >>> > > >>> > +1 for the release. > >>> > > >>> > On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks everyone for giving valuable comments for the RC0 and RC1. > >>> >> > >>> >> I created a new candidate (RC2) build for Oozie-3.1.3 incorporating > >>> most of the comments (including Chris's finding). > >>> >> The following JIRAs were resolved based on the comments: > >>> >> > >>> >> OOZIE-694 Update the Install and Quick start guide with appropriate > >>> hadoop versions for branch-3.1 (Mohammad) > >>> >> OOZIE-602 Update the Hadoop version to be an Apache Hadoop version > >>> (tucu) > >>> >> OOZIE-689 XTestCase proxyuser settings fails with Hadoop > 1.0.0/0.23.1 > >>> (tucu) > >>> >> OOZIE-601 Oozie's POMs should use org.apache.oozie as group (tucu) > >>> >> OOZIE-685 Update License file with 3rd party license information. > >>> (Mohammad) > >>> >> OOZIE-682 Update version 3.1.3 to 3.1.3-incubating in all > >>> pom.xml.(Mohammad) > >>> >> OOZIE-683 Add DISCLAIMER file in the root.(Mohammad) > >>> >> OOZIE-681 Update readme.txt contents.(Mohammad) > >>> >> OOZIE-680 oozie's assembly creates an extra level of empty > subdirectory > >>> for docs. (rvs via tucu) > >>> >> OOZIE-608 testCoordChangeEndTime and testCoordChangeXCommand are > >>> failing(Mohamed). > >>> >> OOZIE-678 Update NOTICE.txt to reflect the workcount binaries into > >>> oozie src(Mohammad) > >>> >> > >>> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at > >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/oozie/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. > >>> >> > >>> >> Please download, test, and try it out from here: > >>> >> > >>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~kamrul/oozie-3.1.3-incubating-candidate-2/ > >>> >> > >>> >> The release log, md5 signature, gpg signature, and rat report all > can > >>> be found at the above link. > >>> >> In case, anyone is interested, the svn tag from the release was > created > >>> could be found at : > >>> >> > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oozie/tags/release-3.1.3-rc2/ > >>> >> > >>> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Feb 15th. > >>> >> > >>> >> Regards, > >>> >> Mohammad > >>> >
