On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be some people assuming that the IPMC wants to > terminate the Kato podling. Looking back I wonder if my original > status review was the source of this:
:-) > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> 2008-11-06 Kato >> >> S: Zero activity. >> R: Terminate. > > This was based on looking at commit and kato-dev@ list activity, both > zero or very low for an extended amount of time. There was no recent > status report. AFAICT Soon after entry, the standards process stalled. This stopped active development. Most of the activity after then has been the community trying to find a way around the standards issue, with little success. Progress depends on Oracle coming to a decision (one way or the other) about the future of the standard. This might happen today, tomorrow or in ten years time. Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
