Hi, There seems to be some people assuming that the IPMC wants to terminate the Kato podling. Looking back I wonder if my original status review was the source of this:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> 2008-11-06 Kato > > S: Zero activity. > R: Terminate. This was based on looking at commit and kato-dev@ list activity, both zero or very low for an extended amount of time. There was no recent status report. Now, as has been pointed out, the project is facing some unique constraints that I wasn't aware of. Thus I followed up: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > The status of Kato (in relation to Oracle's actions) is being > evaluated. Ant is helping the community. Based on the thread at [1]. The resulting status report [2] suggests that before the next report the community should "decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all". As far as I'm concerned, that's a reasonable step forward. I'm looking forward to seeing a followup discussion about this on kato-dev@. The results should be summarized as an action plan in the next status report. [1] http://markmail.org/message/rmdhe57r4gpxq3t7 [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2012 BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
