On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> > wrote: > > > >> Simon Phipps wrote: > >> > >> > unless either the Apache project or the LibreOffice project do > extremely > >> > substantial refactoring very fast, both projects will be using the > same > >> > code for a long time. If we all do things right, this will be in the > >> > context of actual shared repositories. > >> > >> That sounds like a fine scenario. The ASF is good at providing Open > Source > >> to be reused downstream. > >> > >> And hopefully (from my perspective, at least) there will be refactoring, > or > >> even rearchitecting/rewriting, to enable OOo to better participate in > the > >> mobile/cloud arena, with that forming the basis for downstream builds. > >> > > > > I agree on both counts. My sense continues to be that the best outcome > would > > be close to my original proposal[1], although that got substantial > push-back > > from some quarters. > > I saw pushback from multiple sides. From what I can see, that > push-back still exists. Reminding people of this is not going to > help. > Reminding people of what, Sam? As far as I can see the resulting consensus text is still there in the proposal. Are you proposing that it should be removed? S.
