On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> wrote: > >> Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> > unless either the Apache project or the LibreOffice project do extremely >> > substantial refactoring very fast, both projects will be using the same >> > code for a long time. If we all do things right, this will be in the >> > context of actual shared repositories. >> >> That sounds like a fine scenario. The ASF is good at providing Open Source >> to be reused downstream. >> >> And hopefully (from my perspective, at least) there will be refactoring, or >> even rearchitecting/rewriting, to enable OOo to better participate in the >> mobile/cloud arena, with that forming the basis for downstream builds. >> > > I agree on both counts. My sense continues to be that the best outcome would > be close to my original proposal[1], although that got substantial push-back > from some quarters.
I saw pushback from multiple sides. From what I can see, that push-back still exists. Reminding people of this is not going to help. > S. - Sam Ruby "A good leader takes a little more than his share of the blame, a little less than his share of the credit." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
