Jukka, I don't like to force "majority result" if there is controversy.
Having a couple of -1, and other not voting but practically agreeing with you and Ant, is not the way to go. I think they are as ready as they can get, considering the starting point and the general attitude towards incubated projects. I don't think longer incubation will improve the chances of sucees, the understanding of ApacheWay or addressing your concerns (other than artificially)... Would it make a difference, if I step up and make the initial PMC Chair, as I have over the last couple of weeks started my own commitment to the project? -- Niclas On Aug 6, 2009 1:31 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst<[email protected]> wrote: > AFAIK Nowhere... True, but that's how I interpret it, for reasons stated earlier in this thread. My -1 in the Pivot vote is just a statement of concern based on my interpretation of the exit criteria defined in our policy. If it were up to me, I'd ask Pivot to focus a bit more in encouraging others to participate also with writing the code before making them a TLP. You can take that and the other -1 and try to address them before calling another vote, or go with the majority result if you think our concerns are baseless or already addressed. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubs...
